Which of the following represents grounds for appeal in criminal cases?

Grounds for appeal in criminal cases primarily focus on legal principles and procedural correctness rather than the subjective feelings about the outcome of a trial or the strength of the evidence alone. Errors in law and procedural irregularities form a solid foundation for an appeal, as they can affect the fairness of the trial and the integrity of the legal process.

When there are errors in the application of the law, such as incorrect jury instructions or improper admission of evidence, or if due process rights were violated during the trial, these can significantly impair the defendant's ability to receive a fair trial. Such legal missteps can lead to unjust outcomes, making them legitimate grounds for seeking an appeal in hopes of overturning or modifying the original decision.

In contrast, while inadequate punishment, disagreement with the jury's decision, or concerns about the quantity of evidence may reflect dissatisfaction with the trial's outcome, they do not typically constitute valid grounds for appeal. An appeal is concerned with finding faults in the legal process rather than merely contesting the factual conclusions reached by the jury or the perceived severity of the sentence.