What is the purpose of judicial review in administrative law?

Judicial review in administrative law serves the crucial purpose of examining the actions and decisions of administrative agencies to ensure they comply with the law. This process allows courts to assess whether agency actions were taken within their authority, followed proper procedures, and adhered to the legal standards set by statutes and regulations. Judicial review acts as a check on the power of administrative agencies, ensuring that their decisions are lawful, reasonable, and appropriate.

In the context of administrative law, judicial review safeguards individual rights and promotes accountability by allowing affected parties to challenge decisions made by these agencies. Through this process, courts determine whether agencies acted arbitrarily, capriciously, or abused their discretion, ensuring that due process is followed and that any actions taken are justified by law.

The other choices focus on different roles that are not specifically related to the concept of judicial review. For instance, interpreting laws and statutes refers more broadly to statutory interpretation rather than the review of agency actions. Providing legal representation pertains to the role of attorneys rather than the judicial review process. Enforcing administrative regulations relates to actions that agencies may take to implement their rules, distinct from the judicial review's critical evaluation of those regulations and the decisions surrounding them.