Grounds for criminal appeal typically do NOT include which of the following?

The grounds for criminal appeal are typically focused on identifiable legal or procedural issues that occurred during the trial process. Disagreement with the legal interpretation, while it might reflect a subjective view of the case, does not constitute a valid ground for appeal. In the appeal process, judicial decisions are based on established legal principles and precedents, and simply disputing the interpretation of those laws does not suffice unless there is a clear error in how the law was applied.

In contrast, errors in law, procedural irregularities, and new evidence emerging can all provide substantial grounds for an appeal. Errors in law pertain to incorrect application or understanding of the law during the original proceedings. Procedural irregularities refer to failures in following due process or established procedures that could affect the outcome of the trial. New evidence might present significant information that could influence the case result, warranting a re-evaluation of the initial verdict.

Each of these other options reflects a concrete issue that can be substantiated with legal precedent or established rules of procedure, which differ from a mere disagreement with legal interpretations.